Friendships would form more around shared affinity and beliefs rather than arbitrary methods as well. If you allow pawns to have opinions of each other based on their precepts rather than arbitrary ideoligious affiliation, you could have a lot of nuance and different ideologions combining and living peacefully together as long as they aren't too drastically different from each other or whether they are based on how open they are to diverse thought. > Pawns have individual opinions on other pawns based on precept positions. These precept norms wouldn't allow one to deviate too much of course from the core beliefs but represent an accepted range of positions while retaining the same ideoligious group identity.
> Ideologions should be formed around 'norms' instead of fixed static precepts.Īs pawns would have their own precepts and thus express a varied range of beliefs and philosophies, ideoligions would have an accepted 'norm' or range of precepts around which pawns can form stable ideological communities while retaining their individuality. A misogynist can't become a believer in female supremacy for example without first losing their precept of misogyny.) (to be clear, many previous traits such as misogynist, misandrist, nudist, cannibal, transhumanist, flesh purist etc would be replaced with their respective precepts instead that can be dynamically changed over time to represent held ideological positions changing. You could allow ideoligions to drift into different accepted precepts organically this way when enough pawns change their precept stance so that the ideoligical 'norm' of the colony becomes something different. Ideologies on themselves also would present more varied and complex perspectives simultaneously. This way pawns have much more individual variety in thoughts and present a more nuanced and diverse ideological perspective that is both complex and simple in how it would interact between pawns and ideologies. Pawns should have their own individual precepts/beliefs rather than ideoligions brute forcing their precepts from a top down perspective onto pawns.
0 kommentar(er)
